48th Anzaas Congress Melbourne, 1977
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Report on botanical nomenclature—Melbourne 2011. XVIII International Botanical Congress, Melbourne: Nomenclature Section, 18–22 July 2011
Th is is the offi cial Report on the deliberations and decisions of the ten sessions of the Nomenclature Section of the XVIII International Botanical Congress held in Melbourne, Australia, in July 2011. Th e Section took place on fi ve consecutive days prior to the Congress proper. Th e Section meetings were hosted by the School of Botany at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Technical fac...
متن کاملOperation Enduring Freedom: the 48th Combat Support Hospital in Afghanistan.
OBJECTIVE To examine the experience of the 48th Combat Support Hospital (CSH) while deployed to Afghanistan, with an emphasis on trauma care. MATERIALS AND METHODS Before redeployment, a retrospective review was performed on the medical records of all patients treated at the 48th CSH from December 6, 2002 through June 7, 2003. RESULTS During the 6-month period, 10,679 patients were evaluate...
متن کاملMelbourne Automobile Emissions Study
The University of Denver's remote sensor (FEAT) was used for an on-road motor vehicle carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions survey in Australia during April and May, 1992. Twelve locations in Melbourne area were selected as the survey sites. Most of these locations were the on or off ramp of a freeway or a two way road divided by a solid or painted traffic island. The raw data fro...
متن کاملBeal v. Doe (1977)
In the case of Beal v. Doe, decided in 1977, the US Supreme Court ruled that states could constitutionally restrict money from Medicaid from funding elective abortions. After the 1973 case Roe v. Wade [2], in which the US Supreme Court had ruled that women have rights to terminate pregnancies within the first trimester [3], the state of Pennsylvania passed legislation that restricted the use of...
متن کاملPark v. Chessin (1977)
The New York Appellate Court ruled on 11 December 1977 in favor of Steven and Hetty Park and against Herbert Chessin for the wrongful life [5] of the Parks' child. In a wrongful life [5] case, a disabled or sometimes deceased child brings suit against a physician for failing to inform its parents of possible genetic defects, thereby causing harm to the child when born. Park v. Chessin [4] was t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Clinical and Experimental Optometry
سال: 1977
ISSN: 0816-4622,1444-0938
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.1977.tb02887.x